1885] LABOUCHERE'S LETTERS 253 some hurry, because the Tories would make every effort to capture Parnell, whose tendency would be to shilly- shally, and for the time to agree to nothing. Labou- chere's Irish correspondent, who had not seen Parnell for over a fortnight, was extremely candid about his chief's limitations and peculiarities! He concluded: 46 In my deliberate opinion Mr. Gladstone is the only man who can settle the Irish question. He is the only man with hand and heart for the task ; the only man who can reduce to decency the contemptible wretches who so largely com- pose the Liberal party. I thank God that so many of the howlers and gloaters over our sufferings have met their fate," But the Liberal leader was wary. He drew up a note pointing out that the Tories and Nationalists had been in alliance for years, that the Government of the day should bring in a measure at once, which would receive fair play from the Liberals. Liberals might put out an outline of essentials, but a plan could only be carried by a Government. It will be seen that the prospect of a Liberal Government, though not explicitly indicated, was not ruled out, and Rosebery was told that he might go a little farther with Labouchere. When they met on December 12th, Rosebery repeated his extreme aversion from negotia- tion with Parnell at this stage. But the talk was not purely political. Labouchere was intimate with Ran- dolph Churchill, and was full of gossip about him, and also about Dilke, who had become involved in un- happy scandal earlier in the year. Rosebery was in Scotland till almost the end of the year. While there, he received half a dozen letters from Labouchere, some of several pages, with inimitable stories of the negotiations. How Parnell had disappeared " with an Egeria of some kind," and his colleagues were hunting for him ; how some days later they believed that he had " retired to warm salt water baths with a new Egeria, they did not exactly know where" ; how Lord Carnarvon had told Justin MacCarthy that he was in favour of a large measure of Home Rule